Join Premium Membership →
B.Arch and B.Planning by the numbers
NIRF 2025 explained and charted, a side-by-side college comparison, and the JoSAA 2026 and DASA seat data with a rank finder. ← The full guide
What is the NIRF ranking, and why does it matter?
NIRF, the National Institutional Ranking Framework, is the Ministry of Educationβs yearly ranking of Indian institutions. Each institution that takes part submits its own data in one fixed format. NIRF scores it on five parameters and publishes a ranked list for each category. Architecture and Planning is one category: 40 institutions were ranked in 2025.
Why it matters
What it does not tell you
- The data is reported by the institutions themselves.
- Only 40 institutions were ranked, out of about 369 recognised by the Council of Architecture. An unranked college can still be a good one.
- It does not measure studio teaching, design culture, internships or the city you will live in.
- Research and spending marks favour larger, older institutions, and placement batches are small, so a year can swing a lot.
- A rank is no substitute for Council of Architecture approval. Check that first.
How to use it
- Use it to shortlist, then visit, meet students and see their work.
- Look at the factor you care about, not only the overall rank: order the chart below by that factor.
- Compare two or three colleges side by side on the compare tab.
Our advice, not NIRF’s.
The top five, at a glance
What the ranking is made of
Each bar adds up to an institute’s NIRF score; the colours show the points each factor brought, after weighting. Order the colleges by a factor to see who is strongest on it.
Two institutes on the five factors
Placement against median salary
Further right: more of the latest class placed. Higher: a higher median salary. Bigger dot: larger B.Arch intake.
Rank all 40 on any NIRF-sheet factor (intake, women, faculty, research income, placement…)
Ranks and the five scores are copied from the NIRF 2025 Architecture and Planning list. For this list the weights are 0.40, 0.20, 0.20, 0.10 and 0.10: we worked them out from the published scores, which they reproduce to two decimals. The NIRF engineering paper uses different weights (0.30, 0.30, 0.20, 0.10, 0.10), so do not read this list with those. Placement, median salary and intake come from the data sheet each institution submitted to NIRF. 40 institutions were ranked in 2025.
Inside the five scores
Each of the five scores is built from smaller ones: 15 in all. We hold the charts of 39 of the 40 institutions; every chart was checked against that institution’s five published scores.
One institute’s chart
Average share of marks earned
Heat map: every institute, every sub-score (% of the marks earned)
| Institute | SS | FSR | FQE | FRU | PU | QP | FPPP | GPH | GUE | MS | RD | WD | ESCS | PCS | PR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee | 49 | 100 | 82 | 80 | 100 | 79 | 99 | 83 | 100 | 87 | 86 | 76 | 33 | 100 | 74 |
| 2. National Institute of Technology Calicut | 60 | 100 | 96 | 94 | 59 | 89 | 30 | 86 | 100 | 67 | 50 | 100 | 49 | 100 | 58 |
| 3. Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | 55 | 66 | 66 | 85 | 86 | 81 | 85 | 74 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 61 | 31 | 100 | 81 |
| 4. Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur | 36 | 100 | 85 | 62 | 55 | 86 | 22 | 76 | 99 | 63 | 43 | 98 | 21 | 100 | 58 |
| 5. Jamia Millia Islamia | 67 | 100 | 62 | 44 | 38 | 99 | 19 | 100 | 100 | 71 | 85 | 100 | 54 | 100 | 33 |
| 6. Centre for Environmental Planning and Technology University | 89 | 100 | 47 | 50 | 27 | 66 | 93 | 69 | 100 | 68 | 49 | 100 | 2 | 100 | 52 |
| 7. National Institute of Technology Rourkela | 29 | 100 | 81 | 40 | 71 | 100 | 20 | 64 | 97 | 67 | 44 | 86 | 36 | 100 | 54 |
| 8. School of Planning and Architecture New Delhi | 87 | 75 | 53 | 52 | 28 | 38 | 67 | 49 | 96 | 73 | 76 | 94 | 2 | 100 | 100 |
| 9. National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli | 60 | 66 | 48 | 49 | 59 | 78 | 0 | 75 | 100 | 68 | 51 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 81 |
| 10. Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur | 66 | 61 | 58 | 43 | 54 | 78 | 29 | 93 | 100 | 69 | 51 | 100 | 22 | 100 | 35 |
| 11. School of Planning and Architecture Bhopal | 77 | 92 | 64 | 44 | 14 | 25 | 48 | 72 | 90 | 65 | 74 | 99 | 24 | 100 | 58 |
| 12. Malaviya National Institute of Technology | 69 | 65 | 52 | 27 | 61 | 94 | 66 | 83 | 100 | 63 | 55 | 99 | 29 | 100 | 24 |
| 13. National Institute of Technology Patna | 45 | 95 | 71 | 23 | 67 | 95 | 13 | 75 | 82 | 63 | 38 | 86 | 40 | 100 | 32 |
| 14. Chandigarh University | 69 | 100 | 52 | 47 | 38 | 90 | 31 | 50 | 100 | 64 | 83 | 100 | 5 | 100 | 15 |
| 15. College of Engineering Trivandrum | 60 | 100 | 48 | 37 | 31 | 78 | 28 | 92 | 100 | 73 | 20 | 100 | 11 | 100 | 31 |
| 16. Jadavpur University | 42 | 100 | 65 | 29 | 46 | 76 | 26 | 72 | 91 | 65 | 5 | 89 | 22 | 100 | 53 |
| 17. Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology | 70 | 82 | 72 | 43 | 20 | 91 | 41 | 77 | 100 | 64 | 43 | 92 | 18 | 100 | 23 |
| 18. S.R.M. Institute of Science and Technology | 47 | 100 | 56 | 39 | 61 | 93 | 28 | 58 | 93 | 62 | 37 | 82 | 3 | 100 | 19 |
| 19. School of Planning & Architecture, Vijayawada | 79 | 64 | 54 | 40 | 21 | 73 | 14 | 86 | 87 | 66 | 66 | 94 | 8 | 100 | 63 |
| 20. BMS College of Architecture | 74 | 98 | 54 | 38 | 6 | 47 | 4 | 88 | 100 | 53 | 51 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 60 |
| 21. Manipal University Jaipur | 30 | 100 | 89 | 39 | 47 | 58 | 25 | 62 | 100 | 61 | 44 | 87 | 3 | 100 | 11 |
| 22. Birla Institute of Technology | 40 | 100 | 75 | 43 | 34 | 82 | 32 | 42 | 88 | 53 | 36 | 95 | 0 | 100 | 40 |
| 23. Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University | 28 | 100 | 63 | 82 | 45 | 73 | 12 | 45 | 83 | 46 | 30 | 74 | 11 | 100 | 19 |
| 24. Lovely Professional University | 49 | 100 | 73 | 34 | 32 | 88 | 22 | 42 | 81 | 81 | 59 | 80 | 12 | 100 | 26 |
| 25. Amity University | 59 | 100 | 100 | 34 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 79 | 100 | 60 | 82 | 100 | 46 | 100 | 13 |
| 27. Manipal School of Architecture and Planning, MAHE | 73 | 80 | 54 | 47 | 7 | 81 | 3 | 69 | 100 | 52 | 54 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 37 |
| 28. Anna University | 64 | 75 | 56 | 22 | 42 | 93 | 18 | 16 | 94 | 55 | 2 | 98 | 16 | 100 | 83 |
| 29. Nirma University | 69 | 100 | 44 | 34 | 38 | 72 | 11 | 46 | 100 | 53 | 30 | 100 | 6 | 100 | 23 |
| 30. National Institute of Technology Hamirpur | 56 | 67 | 59 | 25 | 28 | 79 | 7 | 81 | 98 | 68 | 42 | 98 | 33 | 100 | 36 |
| 31. M. S. Ramaiah Institute of Technology | 62 | 100 | 47 | 27 | 27 | 57 | 2 | 85 | 100 | 42 | 18 | 100 | 5 | 100 | 31 |
| 32. Dr. M. G. R. Educational and Research Institute | 69 | 100 | 54 | 39 | 17 | 58 | 20 | 42 | 100 | 71 | 53 | 100 | 46 | 100 | 6 |
| 33. Thiagarajar College of Engineering | 69 | 93 | 49 | 13 | 21 | 86 | 14 | 65 | 100 | 50 | 1 | 100 | 8 | 100 | 44 |
| 34. Christ University | 52 | 100 | 64 | 47 | 19 | 60 | 10 | 28 | 73 | 58 | 59 | 99 | 16 | 100 | 26 |
| 35. National Institute of Technology, Raipur | 48 | 83 | 62 | 24 | 47 | 87 | 3 | 35 | 97 | 60 | 38 | 99 | 30 | 80 | 19 |
| 36. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University | 67 | 62 | 41 | 23 | 20 | 92 | 13 | 96 | 100 | 50 | 21 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 31 |
| 37. BMS School of Architecture, Yelahanka | 57 | 91 | 44 | 26 | 35 | 14 | 4 | 73 | 88 | 35 | 12 | 92 | 3 | 100 | 29 |
| 38. Chitkara University | 47 | 70 | 48 | 39 | 16 | 91 | 16 | 56 | 91 | 75 | 38 | 82 | 3 | 100 | 11 |
| 39. Faculty of Architecture and Planning, Dr APJ Abdul Kalam Technical University | 62 | 85 | 53 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 89 | 88 | 53 | 2 | 88 | 20 | 100 | 32 |
| 40. Anant National University | 67 | 94 | 52 | 39 | 5 | 0 | 19 | 73 | 93 | 52 | 23 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 6 |
What moves the NIRF score most
Every sub-score counts for its parameter’s weight (TLR 0.40, RPC 0.20, GO 0.20, OI 0.10, PR 0.10). “Spread” is how many points of the overall score separate the best and the weakest of the 39.
| Sub-score | Lowest | Highest | Marks | Average share | Spread (points) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Publications (PU) | 0.0 | 60.0 | 60 | 37% | 12.0 |
| Perception (PR) | 5.6 | 100.0 | 100 | 39% | 9.4 |
| Financial resources and their use (FRU) | 4.0 | 28.2 | 30 | 42% | 9.7 |
| Faculty-student ratio (FSR) | 18.4 | 30.0 | 30 | 89% | 4.6 |
| Placement and higher studies (GPH) | 6.4 | 40.0 | 40 | 68% | 6.7 |
| Student strength (SS) | 5.6 | 17.8 | 20 | 59% | 4.9 |
| Faculty qualification and experience (FQE) | 8.2 | 20.0 | 20 | 61% | 4.7 |
| Quality of publications (QP) | 0.0 | 20.0 | 20 | 70% | 4.0 |
| Projects and professional practice (FPPP) | 0.1 | 19.8 | 20 | 26% | 3.9 |
| Median salary (MS) | 10.5 | 30.0 | 30 | 63% | 3.9 |
| Region diversity (RD) | 0.4 | 25.9 | 30 | 44% | 2.6 |
| University examinations (GUE) | 21.8 | 30.0 | 30 | 95% | 1.6 |
| Economically and socially challenged students (ESCS) | 0.1 | 10.7 | 20 | 18% | 1.1 |
| Women diversity (WD) | 18.2 | 30.0 | 30 | 93% | 1.2 |
| Facilities for physically challenged students (PCS) | 16.0 | 20.0 | 20 | 99% | 0.4 |
What each sub-score measures
| Score | Part of | Marks | What it measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student strength (SS) | TLR | 20 | Sanctioned intake and students on roll, with doctoral students. |
| Faculty-student ratio (FSR) | TLR | 30 | Full-time regular faculty for the students enrolled. Full marks at about 1 faculty member to 15 students; none below 1 to 50. |
| Faculty qualification and experience (FQE) | TLR | 20 | Share of faculty with a PhD, and a balance of faculty with up to 8, 8 to 15 and over 15 years of experience. |
| Financial resources and their use (FRU) | TLR | 30 | Capital and running expenditure per student over three years, excluding new buildings and hostels. |
| Publications (PU) | RPC | 60 | Publications per faculty member, from third-party databases, less retracted papers. |
| Quality of publications (QP) | RPC | 20 | Citations per faculty member and the share of papers in the top 25 percent by citations. |
| Projects and professional practice (FPPP) | RPC | 20 | Sponsored research and consultancy income per faculty member over three years. |
| Placement and higher studies (GPH) | GO | 40 | Share of graduates placed plus share selected for higher studies, over three years. |
| University examinations (GUE) | GO | 30 | Share of the approved intake passing within the stipulated time. |
| Median salary (MS) | GO | 30 | Median salary of graduates over three years. |
| Region diversity (RD) | OI | 30 | Students from other states (most of the marks) and from other countries. |
| Women diversity (WD) | OI | 30 | Share of women among students (expected 50 percent) and faculty (expected 20 percent). |
| Economically and socially challenged students (ESCS) | OI | 20 | Share of undergraduates whose full tuition is reimbursed by the institution. |
| Facilities for physically challenged students (PCS) | OI | 20 | Lifts or ramps, walking aids and transport, and specially designed toilets. |
| Perception (PR) | PR | 100 | A survey of employers and academic peers. |
Marks are those printed on the Architecture and Planning charts and differ from the engineering paper in places (publications carry 60 marks here). Definitions are paraphrased from NIRF’s methodology paper; where the chart differs, the chart is followed.
Side by side on NIRF factors
Pick up to four of the 40 NIRF-ranked institutions. Every number comes from the data the institution submitted to NIRF. The best value in a row is highlighted where “best” is clear.
Everything below is read from the data each institution submitted to NIRF for the 2025 Architecture and Planning ranking. The institution, not NIRF, is the author of these numbers. Placement is for the 5-year B.Arch programme unless a row says B.Planning; "placed" counts students placed through the institute, and many graduates go on to higher studies or practice instead. Median salary is the figure the institution reported for placed graduates, in rupees a year, and is shown only when at least one student was placed. Batch sizes are small, so one year can swing a percentage a lot: read the three-year average beside it.
Seat allotment, by the numbers
Worked out from the JoSAA 2026 file, for JEE Main Paper 2 institutes, OPEN category, gender-neutral pool.
Rank finder
Enter your rank, choose the programme and your category. The list shows where a seat of your kind was still open at your rank in 2026.
| Institute | Pool | Round 1 close | Last round close | Status in 2026 |
|---|
Closing ranks by institute
No seats of this kind in 2026. Try another quota (NITs use Home State and Other State; the SPAs and IITs use All India).
How a pool moved, round 1 to 5
The category ladder at one institute
No seats of this kind.
How to read these numbers
Different rank lists
B.Arch seats at NITs, SPAs and IIEST use the JEE Main Paper 2A rank, B.Planning uses Paper 2B. IIT B.Arch seats follow the JEE Advanced and AAT route. DASA seats have their own, much smaller, rank cut-offs. Never compare an engineering rank with these numbers.
Closing rank is the last seat filled
If your rank is lower (a smaller number) than the closing rank of a category in a round, a seat of that kind was still allotted at that rank. It is not a promise for next year. Seat numbers and applicants change every year.
Quota matters as much as rank
HS is Home State, OS is Other State, AI is All India. At an NIT you are compared only with candidates in your own pool. The same college can look easy for its home state and hard for outsiders.
Gender-neutral and female-only pools
Female-only seats have their own ranks. A woman can compete in both pools, and the more favourable result applies.
Opening to closing
Opening rank is the best rank allotted in the pool in that round, closing is the last. The gap tells you how the pool is filled, not what you should expect.
NRI, PIO, OCI and foreign students
Final closing rank in each year’s last round (2025: Round 3, 2026: Round 2). A smaller number means a harder seat. These ranks are in the DASA lists, not the JoSAA lists.
The numbers, year on year
| Institute | Programme | Quota | 2025 final | 2026 final | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Institute of Technology Calicut | B.Arch | DASA CIWG | 1,071 | 972 | Tougher by 9% |
| National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli | B.Arch | DASA CIWG | 1,384 | 1,015 | Tougher by 27% |
| School of Planning & Architecture, New Delhi | B.Arch | DASA CIWG | 1,132 | 1,733 | Easier by 53% |
| School of Planning & Architecture, Vijayawada | B.Arch | DASA CIWG | 3,514 | 3,977 | Easier by 13% |
| School of Planning & Architecture, New Delhi | B.Planning | DASA CIWG | 2,466 | 4,053 | Easier by 64% |
| School of Planning & Architecture, New Delhi | B.Arch | DASA Non CIWG | 6,016 | 4,709 | Tougher by 22% |
| National Institute of Technology Calicut | B.Arch | DASA Non CIWG | 19,111 | 6,351 | Tougher by 67% |
| Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur | B.Arch | DASA CIWG | 6,816 | 6,531 | Tougher by 4% |
| School of Planning & Architecture, Vijayawada | B.Planning | DASA CIWG | 7,689 | not offered | 2025 only |
| School of Planning & Architecture, Vijayawada | B.Arch | DASA Non CIWG | 9,956 | not offered | 2025 only |
| School of Planning & Architecture, Bhopal | B.Arch | DASA CIWG | 5,223 | 10,982 | Easier by 110% |
| National Institute of Technology Hamirpur | B.Arch | DASA CIWG | 10,999 | not offered | 2025 only |
| Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur | B.Arch | DASA CIWG | 11,084 | not offered | 2025 only |
| National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli | B.Arch | DASA Non CIWG | 21,988 | 12,117 | Tougher by 45% |
| National Institute of Technology Raipur | B.Arch | DASA CIWG | 26,086 | not offered | 2025 only |
| Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology Bhopal | B.Arch | DASA CIWG | 22,175 | 43,669 | Easier by 97% |
“Easier” means the closing rank went up (a seat was available to a lower-ranked student), “tougher” means it came down. One year of change is a small sample.
How many seats are on offer
From the JoSAA 2026 seat matrix, which covers the NIT+ programmes in the file. The three SPAs, the IITs and a few other institutes are not in it, so their seats are not charted.
Prepared 2 November 2026 with AI assistance from the NIRF India Rankings 2025 and its data sheets, the JoSAA 2026 opening and closing rank file and seat matrix, and the DASA 2025 and 2026 report. See the sources. Nothing here promises a rank, a seat or an admission.